
Few corners of finance compete with the world market for bank license in worldwide terms — especially when it comes to harsh competition and rapid change — a status quo evidenced as recently as 2025 began. The changes aren’t subtle. The first tick the license committee used to grant a license ten years ago was old pals’ act, with a smidgen of credibility capital and somewhat insouciant bonhomie being all you really needed to puppet your way through requirements.
Today, we live in a world where regulators take a harder line, corresponding banks have become less forgiving, and the capital bar has been set much higher (capital requirements for global SIFIs include strict liquid asset rules).
Investors, meanwhile, may further ask:
- Which would be the most beneficial jurisdiction toward their objectives and what amount of initial capital is required on the first day of operations?
- And before starting with a banking license application, can it be rejected or terminated at an early stage by the regulator?
The answers have changed. They are not the idle coffee-time opinions over which we have been so hungrily poring all these years. Now, they need data points, insight into political winds, and recognition that the slightest move in your AML policy or one correspondent too many can fracture your pattern.
Other investors and operators fall for whispers — such as an international bank license for sale in Dominica, or US international banking licenses available for purchase that would deliver direct access to the dollar clearing system. Alternatively, some are conducting their business with a CIF & payment institution Cyprus STP brokerage to offer more products under less regulatory risk but not full-banking license level. These are goals, and they can either be gold or a trap; which one you choose will determine if these goals light your budget on fire.
Market Context
Global geopolitics has redrawn the banking landscape in real time over the past decade, a trend that intensified in 2020. The Transparency Initiative for automatic exchange of tax info
—once a distant idea, now an established framework—has eroded the “privacy premium” that some tax havens, especially for certain client profiles, have languished upon over the last decade. As a result, the top jurisdictions are only becoming further entrenched in their position at the expense of any emerging mid-tier contenders who must already find it difficult to break through the ceiling.
On the other hand, we’re seeing more of a voice from some of those who sell licenses on the lower tiers. They potentially can give you a charter on paper (and, in practical terms, this often signifies you end up with a non-recognized asset for most settlement banks). That is when sound business plans die on the vine; not for lack of ambition but simply because commercial risk in cross-border payment contexts is very, very real.
2023 to — The Wall Rebuilt
There was still time to get in with less than $5 million paid in capital if you arrived by 2023, but that brief window has closed at most offshore centers. The door has been shut by three big developments:
- FATF Update. This has been the most meaningful change in regulation of the last two years. One of the reasons for this is that globally AML/CFT standards have increased, and compliance can no longer be achieved through a “light touch” approach. Accordingly, regulators are more confident in saying no to inadequate applications early in the process.
- Correspondent banking de-risking — Major correspondent banks are using this opportunity to further review the risks and, as a result, many licensed banks may find themselves without any solution if their jurisdiction is seen with any reputational or political risk.
- No Practical Minimum — The actual threshold for entry is no longer limited by a statutory minimum. Although some legacy laws still use that term, they have set the real bar. This has edged a bit higher now, with minimum paid-in capital being around $10 million in some reasonably decent jurisdictions; Tier 1 is about $12–15 million.
Jurisdiction Snapshot – 2025
Tier 1 – More Favorable, Greater Controlled
- Puerto Rico: The darling for those trying to have USD access. It uniquely combines US territorial jurisdiction (OCIF + Federal Reserve) with a favorable tax environment.
- Capital: $10 billion minimum-legal; however, you need about $12–$15 million in capital, the difference is what it will require to satisfy regulators and correspondents.
- Application Fee: $1 million.
- Timeline: 24–30 months (unless you buy an existing license).
- Downside: Most people think it’s easy to launch correspondent onboarding, but it’s not unless you are in US territory.
- Bermuda: The digital asset and fintech community’s new love, with a caution note by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA).
- Capital: $10 million, and an additional ~$1 million for setup.
- Pro: A reputation for being crypto-friendly, albeit compliance-first.
- The biggest players: digital payment networks and crypto banks with deep pockets.
- Gibraltar: Under EU rules, set to become more robustly blended into blockchain and fintech banking.
- Capital Needed: > €5 million + CRD IV buffers.
- Luxembourg: The Mecca of Private Banking and fund servicing.
- Funding: A really large capital i.e. ≥ ca ~ €8.7 million & potential specific buffers depending on the risk profile.
- Specialties: Wealth management experts, global fund administrators.
Tier 2 – Difficult, but Feasible
- Belize: Legally $3 million (Unrestricted)/$1 million (Restricted), but realistically, you will need at least $5–10 million to open a decent affiliate partner in 2025.
- Profile of the candidate: The merit to become strong in AML/CFT right from day one.
- Saint Lucia: Restricted licenses with financial capital requirements of between $2.5 and $5 million.
- Headline: At a lower entry level compared to Tier 1, but a long way to go for top-tier correspondents.
Tier 3 – License Illusion
- Dominica: $1 million on paper, but procedures are everything; correspondents would not even talk to you without a real base.
- Vanuatu, Comoros, Gambia: The original “license mills.” They can establish a state-sanctioned charter but are largely meaningless in business. Correspondent banking is essential for a legitimate bank’s existence.
Special Cases
- Seychelles: $5,000,000 working contribution minimum. This is possible for certain types of niche models (e.g., specific trade finance structures) but not practical enough to scale for normal cross-border consumer or corporate banking.
- Panama: Broadly licensed for licensed banks in top-tier jurisdictions, $10 million capital requirement is just the starting point.
Trends to Watch in 2025
- Pre-licensing endorsement: Before an approval for this level of license is given, your core banking system must be stress-tested, you need digital onboarding live, and AML transaction monitoring.
- Consolidation: Smaller licensees from 2018 to 2020 are selling out to larger operators who don’t have to raise money.
- Polarization: The 1.5 Tier is vanishing (it’s now just Tier 1, or the Elsevier tiers).
- Hybrid offshore model: Complete end-to-end with efficient European EMI or Cyprus STP brokerage with CIF and PI licensed offers — spreading risk between customers and customer services.
Practical Pointers
- Budget Realism: Underestimate everything, particularly your compliance cost — this will bite you harder than it could have ever existed to build these platforms.
- Correspondent Migrations: Test correspondent appetite upfront; get some soft commitments from potential correspondent partners before you spend millions on a license.
- A Series of Stepping Stones: If Tier 1 is not possible currently, you can create a track record at an EMI or MTF.
What are the new banking regulations for 2025?
Banking regulation will tighten in 2025, mainly due to an increase in the minimum capital requirement to USD 10 million, the adoption of FATF 2024 standards, and enhanced control over the origin of funds and risk management. Major players will undergo biennial compliance checks in the first year, while others will be subject to annual audits.
What is the banking forecast for 2025?
Smaller countries will look to consolidate; Puerto Rico & Bermuda will grow, and the fintechs are coming with significant increases in digital-first license applications.
What are the priorities of international bank supervision 2025?
Lifetime security, transparent transactions, robust cyber-resilience, secure digital ID onboarding, verified UBO, and real-time cross-border inter-regulator cooperation.
What is the EU banking Regulation 2025?
The face of EU banking regulation in 2025? These are CRD VI and CRR III, increasing capital buffers, stronger governance norms, and the parallel incorporation of ESG risk through prudential supervision.