Eternity Law International News AML compliance in Canada: Regulation of Payment Service Providers

AML compliance in Canada: Regulation of Payment Service Providers

Published:
November 15, 2021

Payment service providers (PSPs) in Canada must put a risk-based AML/CFT program in place to comply with an AML Law, otherwise, they face regulatory risks. Find out how money services businesses (MSBs) and PSPs fall under AML regulations and what compliance represents for these businesses.

The FINTRAC has updated the Money Laundering Laws. These regulations set up increased oversight and expand the monitoring regime to cover recent innovations. As currently drafted, the regulations apply to MSBs, among other institutions. Given the increased focus on addressing AML/CFT compliance, and the significant penalties for noncompliance, MSBs, and PSPs in Canada should be familiar with their regulatory obligations, and know how to deploy appropriate AML/CFT measures to detect and prevent money laundering cases.

According to the Canadian AML law, an MSB is an institution that delivers any of these services:

  • Foreign exchange dealing;
  • Money transfer;
  • Dealing in virtual currency,
  • Account issuance,
  • Merchant acquiring.

Under the new regulation, such institutions now are required to follow certain rules, one of with is registration with FINTRAC and compliance with certain MSB obligations under the regulatory framework.

The point of contention

Money transferring often leads to many discussions and seems to have not enough clarity. Specifically, there arises a question of whether a PSP is treated to be involved in money transfer and whether, because of this service, they are deemed to be an MSB which will make them comply with the same regulations applicable to such service provisions.

Overview of current regulations in Canada

Payment service businesses, defined as 3rd-party entities that assist commercial customers to accept a variety of online payment methods, are not determined in the PCMLTFA, related regulations, or by the regulatory body FINTRAC, and thus would only fall under the regulation if they satisfy the criteria of a defined reporting organization. Given that PSPs efficiently handle funds transfers between a buyer and a seller; it has not been clarified whether this offering is regarded as a funds transferring service and whether this would make a PSP considered an MSB.

As to FINTRAC, an establishment handling money transfers for the sake of the service is deemed as an MSB, while an establishment transferring funds to carry its actual services is not. For instance, companies that make money transfers under utility, payroll, lease, or other payments are not regarded as MSBs, as the funds dealing is an outcome to their main activity. Similarly, companies that offer settlement services to traders in the name of their customers for the acquirement of products or services, are not deemed as MSBs, because the transfer of funds is accomplished solely to maintain the company’s merchant services.

Based on FINTRAC’s explanation, PSPs that do not deliver money transfers for the sake of the service, are not MSBs and are not obliged to follow specific requirements. Nevertheless, not officially regulated, financial establishments and other 3rd parties often view PSPs to be involved in a business that features higher ML/TF risks, and consequently, they regularly require PSPs to register as an MSB.

Mоnеy Lаundering and Tеrrorist Finаncing Vulnerabilities of PSPs

The Financial Action Task Force equates payment business the services of which include funds used for purchases within a limited amount of merchants with a limited value for products and services with closed loop cards. Thus the guidance on AML/CFT regulation is not intended to apply to these services. Hence, the FATF regards these types of payment service businesses as having lesser risk for criminal proceeds.

Other PSPs that do not cover by this definition are unprotected from higher ML/TF risks. Their exemption from the PCMLTFA and related regulations in Canada does not coincide with the FATF’s approach to the risks connected with such businesses. The risks related to these types of PSPs can be substantial:

  • Anonymous transaction

Services that deliver an opportunity to a customer to buy, register, or use payment methods without any identification elevate the risk the customer is not the person they state they are.

  • Time of operation

Services that are done via the Internet and allow any transfer or acceptance of payments, can be used to move money quickly around the globe. This creates difficulties in tracing the origin of capital.

  • Scope of reach

Services that enable the transfer of funds globally can be used for ML/TF purposes, especially if such offerings are available in countries with undeveloped AML CFT regimes.

  • Different jurisdictions – different rules

The PSP may be registered in one jurisdiction while customers are based in another and therefore ruled by different AML CFT regimes; this is particularly important if the business operates in a jurisdiction with weakened AML CFT controls.

  • Source of financing

Services that allow 3rd-party funding from faceless sources are at a higher risk for ML/TF as the origin of capital can be complicated to control.

  • Decentralization extent

Such business models that are based on a certain number of parties in the supply chain are causing anxiety when the parties belong to different AML CFT regimes or when some of them come from sectors not covered in ML/TF regulations.

  • No direct relationship with an underlying customer

Lack of such relations can make it difficult for PSPs to estimate the value and volume of transactions made by the underlying customer, to rate whether this coincides with expectations for that customer or serves as a sign or indication of fraud or a money laundering or terrorist financing operation. Besides, the PSP must focus on due diligence measures. As payment service providers cannot determine the source of capital and identify the customer, they could bear the risk of infringing AML and sanctions regulations in their jurisdiction.

  • Credit risk

If an underlying customer is involved in credit card fraud, etc., the PSP will take the responsibility for covering those losses.

  • Risk of reputational damage

In the case of accidentally becoming associated with a money laundering or terrorist financing scheme, PSPs may face negative reactions by a large number of people.

Not only do PSPs face risks, the organizations that hold accounts with a PSP also are at risk under this relation. Particularly, the financial institutions must undertake customer diligence measures; they cannot identify the underlying customer, track the source of money, or the nature of the relations on their own. Moreover, as the financial institutions eventually process the transactions, they may unintentionally process false or illegal transactions and for that reason are exposed to the risk of AML CFT breech.

Summing up

Since payment service providers are now not regulated, there are no specific requirements to have an AML program, unless at the insistency of your financial business partner or another 3rd-party. But, even so, these businesses should develop an AML/CFT program to control the ML/TF risks related to their business to prepare for future regulatory changes.

Contacts

For more information about compliance with anti-money laundering rules in Canada or another jurisdiction you are interested in, please contact our specialists. You can also see our offers in the category “Ready-made companies” and “Licenses for sale”.

You could be interested

Foreign bank account

Foreign bank account : all the advantages and risks.  Now, due to the situation with deoffshorization, entrepreneurship need to turn to the international banking services. Therefore, the question of how to open an account in a foreign banking institution is now in the mind of almost everyone who is actively involved in business. Advantages of...

TOP 5 Best Offshore Jurisdiction for Banking Licenses

When planning to set up offshore banking establishments dealing with crypto-currencies, managing capital of investors or functioning as a simple transactional institution, it is necessary to carefully study list of offshore countries being profitable for launching such a firm. Offshore licenses for banks are official certificates allowing these institutions to offer various services to customers...

Ways to obtain the citizenship

Ways of obtaining the citizenship Ways of obtaining citizenship. Citizenship is the legal relationship of a person with the state in which he lives, a list of mutual rights and obligations of an individual and the state. Citizenship can be obtained in such legal ways: after birth; by territorial affiliation by birth; on the basis of receipt;...

Functioning of Asset Management Companies

Establishments possessing official rights for investing and exercising control over capitals for their customers. Investments’ nature are completely varied. Asset management companies are sometimes considered organizations controlling money and circulations of capitals. Organizations are classified into various types depending on internal structure and purpose of activity. Joint investments firm. Hedge, index and exchanges funding structures....

Ready-Made Company in Spain

Spain has established itself as a prime destination for global investors endeavoring to broaden their commercial horizons. Its strategic placement within Europe, dynamic economic vitality, and multifarious market offerings collectively render it an alluring prospect for those in pursuit of avenues for expansion. In recent times, one avenue that has garnered substantial attention as a...

Fintech companies in Ukraine

Recently, quite a lot of Fintech projects have appeared in Ukraine; they are working to assist in optimizing and simplifying procedures for financial services. Company with financial license in this state is a profitable option even for beginners. The activities of FinTech startups are aimed at discovering commerciality problem areas and creating their own developments...

Related posts

Payment Processing and Compliance: Navigating the Regulatory Landscape

In 2022, the mean fiscal impact of a data leak hit $4,35 million. It was highly expected, if not bound to be realized, that this figure would reach the $5 million mark in 2023. This only emphasizes the vital need for secure fiscal technology. For those few who still have some doubt about the security...

Opening a payment system account in Canada

Canada is in list of most-developed countries in terms of fin-technologies and innovatory payment mechanisms. With its sustained economic environment and strict regulative basis, Canada attracts organizations wanting to get accounts in payment systems. Canadian authorities are actively supporting the progress and wide involvement of fin-technologies; it creates a benevolent basis for business-activities in niche...

How Europe’s AML regulation affects crypto

With expectations for an updated legal and regulatory mechanism toward virtual funds, experts state the EU might place a more hard-line attitude on cryptos. As specified in the recent media reports, 6 EU member states, namely, Austria, Germany, Italy, Spain, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands are on their way of implementing an AML law that will...

Regulation of cryptocurrency in Canada

Since the FinTech sector is getting more popular, many people are curious to what extent cryptocoins and related products are legal and usable. The brief answer is yes, buying and selling them is legal, however, Canada does not consider them legal tender. As this status often leads to misunderstandings, let’s take a look at the...

Compliance GDPR

GDPR COMPLIANCE: REGULATIONS FOR THE EXPORT OF PERSONAL DATA FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION Compliance with GDPR is an urgent issue, since in recent years, when accessing any Internet resource, active users of the World Wide Web noted a change in privacy policy, as well as an update to this system. There has also been a...

Legal regulation of cryptocurrency in Canada

Cryptocurrencies in Canada is as a way of payment, which is noted by a large number of installed bitcoin-ATMs. Canada occupies the second position in the world after the USA. Here, developments are being actively pursued to better comprehend Blockchain technology. To this end, the government develops the digital version of the Canadian dollar. Now...
Fill the blank: